My first aim here is to show this video from HeilRJ and Rom7oo mutual contribution, an occasion to see who is actually more popular than the other, i rate both of them very high.

Is someone have a preference ? Who is the London king ?

Honestly both are amazing players however for talent and skill, hazard tops it.
But if i was a manager, i would choose sanchez cause he takes on the role of fabregas and costa for chelsea in arsenal. he has a high work rate and is very crucial for the team.

Hazard is an amazing player with a good work rate, but comparing to sanchez, thats a different story.

Like comparing benzema to suarez, suarez is a better player, but benzema would fit in any team cause he has the ability to take on different roles like sanchez.

nevertheless great video and topic for us to discuss +1!

^ True +1

Not being bias but by the performances it's no doubt Sanchez. Hazard was invisible in the World Cup and disappointed massively while Sanchez carried chile on his shoulders to just barely get knocked out by Brazil on penalties. Also Sanchez works harder, defends more, and he has much more goals and assists. Hazard has bright future but in my opinion he's highly overrated because he disappears in the big games

Hazard and Sanchez are both an amazing players. However, Hazard is 2 years younger and he is an Attacking midfielder and plays mostly as a Winger, whereas Sanchez is a Forward winger. As for me though, I have to go for Hazard. He is younger and he will just improve while being a top class player as a 23 years old. It would be great to have both of them in the same team though, Hazard on the left wing and Sanchez on the right.

Hazard is great player, always has amazing perfomances in Chelsea. But, I would rather choose Alexis because Chelsea could actually live without Hazard more than Arsenal without of Alexis.

Why do ppl say Sanchez is a forward at arsenal? He's at right wing while giroud or welbeck as striker. Sometimes Sanchez plays cam. If Sanchez is a forward so too is hazard then because wingers are part of the forward position

After last season I would say Hazard, but nowadays after Alexis performances this season you have to say it's Alexis, he got everything what you want in team, shame we can't clone him.

From a Real fan and imo..Sanchez over Hazard

i'd go for sanchez. after what he have done for our team. his work rate is outrageous.

Sanchez > Hazard.... but Hazard is younger by 2 years. On the long run, Hazard may be the better choice. But right now it's Sanchez for sure.

^ Agree.

They're difficult to compare, because you have to take so many things into consideration. Everybody seems to go for Sanchez if you ask them who's better, because his goal and assist statistics are better than Hazards. However, Sanchez often plays in a central role, where you normally have a bigger impact on the game and this is displayed in the statistics. Hazard is not meant to score a lot of goals, that is not his game. It's more about making other defenders mark him and open up spaces for his teammates by doing so. He's a creator, while Sanchez is more a striker-esque type of player. Some of you are going to say: "Your argument is bs, because Sanchez has more assists than Hazard", but I'm sure if you'd look at the secondary assists statistics, Hazard would have much more. Also, at Arsenal practically every attack involves Alexis because - let's face it - he's the guy carrying them, they are dependent on him. At Chelsea, we also have other great attacking players like Oscar and Willian, who can create and score. I'm not saying Hazard is not important, we are better with him than without him, but he is not the only player we rely on. Hazard's also only 23, while Alexis is 26. I'm sure Hazard will be a much better player at 26 than Alexis.

hazard for the future

@JuanMata We are not saying it because of his goals/assists, but for his gameplay, his incredible workrate to be involved every time. He's not the one who's carrying us alone, but Yea, he's our best player. In Arsenal he got bigger place, more balls, than Hazard in Chelsea. But you got a point that Hazard is mostly on Wing, while Alexis is going more deeper to pitch, on the left, middle or in the right no matter where the ball is. Alexis is older that's true, nobody is taking fact that Hazard may be one of the best players in next years but nowadays I'm saying it's Alexis.

Sanchez > Hazard > Suarez. Enrique's biggest mistake to sell Sanchez.

Sanchez . At Somethings Hazard is better and other things Sanchez but if put on scale then Sanchez . I demand more from Hazard and he can give more . He has incredible potential . One main concern I have with Hazard is his finishing . He gets himself in definite goalscoring positions and does not finish. Give those chances to Sanchez and he would have buried them .

And who would I want to have in team at the moment , I would stay with Hazard . Like I said some qualities he has are better and the moment they are what we need .

Hazard for me.
For work rate Sanchez beats everyone in EPL now, but Hazard overall is a bit better... I would fear facing Hazard more than Sanchez that's for sure... But ironically I would want to have Sanchez in my team.

They are both great, though

I'd say its same with the De Gea situation. Arsenal are relying on Sanchez while we have Fabregas assisting Costa. If we swapped Hazard and Sanchez over, Hazard would have a more attacking duty at Arsenal and would up his scoring/assisting stats.

Off field which includes training and attitude Hazard >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchez

Hazard is better on defence. Sanchez in attack, but overall Hazard > Sanchez

^ I brought in some other attacking midfielders too

Sanchez is a bigger diver too