Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

Spurs with or without Kane.
Ledley 5 months ago
Celtic, Australia 29 1018

With him in it i feel they score goals and is the focal point of the attack

With him out i feel they are more desperate to win.

--

If you were manager, What would you choose ?

0
Comments
Emobot7 5 months ago
399 9807

I like them better with him than withouth personally because I feel they play generally cleaner with him. When Spurs are desperate, they can get a bit dirty, though even when he is there, they can play pretty roughly. But still, as a manager, I rather have him on my side than not having him. He offer something no other Spurs player have.

0
DarthFooty 5 months ago
Queens Park Rangers, United States 8 431

With him for sure. It is always a blessing to have different ways to beat a team. He has his way and the team looks to get him the ball plenty. But, they also play off him which is opened up more because of him, thus they have other ways to score or beat you.

0
Ledley 5 months ago
Celtic, Australia 29 1018

hmmm.. i posted this as i noticed that when he returned from injury. He seemed to be the only focal point of the attack, maybe because Dele Alli is also missing.

Also, i noticed that him tracking back in defence against Chelsea was a sorry sight for a out and out striker.

0